|
|
All people want good personal living for them and their family, but in some territories are not defined laws which best for the majority that provides stability, health, food, education, etc. An alternative is by general and community voting of its inhabitants, which could define the direction of its territory by majority. |
People desire personal and family well-being but it is important to know and define where and who should provide that personal and/or family well-being. The territory is an important factor to be able to develop according to your thinking. The possibility for all inhabitants to decide the destiny of their land, whether by establishing a democratic, socialist or other government, is constructive.  OPTION 1: Capitalist democratic system and free will. Each person provides, contributes with their work and abilities what is necessary for their subsistence, personal development and that of their family. This system characterizes: The individual with his cohabitants decides the destiny of his territory by settling with his representatives the formalization of necessary laws and regulations, there is the right to possession, free thought and punishable action among others, considering that social security may not be as careful of the population with fewer resources and training. Disadvantages: If in each inhabitant there is ignorance of the system, duties and rights, absence of values ??and principles, the environment becomes a fight with each other for what they think and should be done, this system is good when the majority of its inhabitants consider common thinking and purposes, order and honesty in the realization of any project OPTION 2: Communist socialist system and/or dictatorship. He provides everything for personal subsistence and his own. The central government is supposed to supply, supply, supply, provision, provide, deliver, provide, equip, supply, facilitate, equip, administer, gather, supply, cover, prepare, prevent. This system is characterized by renouncing possession and the right to free choice and will, the individual contribution belongs to the government and its territory. OPTION 3: Socialism with capitalism: The central government provides according to what the people and territory supply. Each individual in their productive life allocates a percentage of their production to the central government, in exchange they will receive social security, housing, food, health, and education. There is no right to possession and all human and territorial resources belong to the territory managed by a government which is accountable to the people through a leader. OPTION 4: Capitalism with intellectualism: All resources of the territory are intended to meet the basic needs of its people plus education and improvement in every sense, including intellectual, for the benefit of the being in any aspect and/or to avoid unbalanced use of one towards the other. . The individual contributes half of his salary, goods, produced in exchange for education, health, housing, social welfare. It is characterized by the right to possession and free will of thought and action.
In the next section, select the option that best harmonizes with you, thinking about the future of your loved ones and your territory. Remember that these writings are only philosophical expressions and essays, which do not mean a change or modification in the current situation of your region until approved by the majority of its inhabitants, rulers, legislation, laws or otherwise. |
|
