To represent and direct a country requires universal values ​​and principles adopted in consciousness and thought, because this will lead the positive or negative destiny of your region or society... That it is better to choose a single representative/actor, two or three or another?

Let us take into account for this vote that a single representative/leader can act constructively or destructively with his people due to a whim, a thought and ideology, unlike three representatives who expand the decision-making power through ideological thinking, gender and decision-making alternatives plus voting. because of some dilemma between them. Which option does it harmonize with?

1- A single representative/leader for a country, region or society genuinely knowing their intention, thought and conscience (how would you do to really know what is in their intention and thought?)
2- Two representatives/leaders for a country, region or society (deficient due to the absence of voting between them)
3- Three representatives/leaders for a country, region or society
4- A representative/non-leader who discloses, abides by, submits the decision by vote of the congress/assembly/council delegate on all issues of consideration of the country, region or society


Suggestion for sides in voting for the chamber congress or another: It is better for each side to elect only up to a maximum of three representatives per seat, who are favored/selected for their thinking according to the clan and their constructive or destructive history or another made known to the voters in general.

More reasons and votes